Closer to the Bottom

Loren Kaye

President of the California Foundation for Commerce and Education


If all economic news is bad news, this item won’t disappoint.

April’s S&P Case-Shiller home price index was released yesterday, showing that home prices in 20 major U.S. cities have dropped a record 15.3% in the past year and are now back to where they were in 2004. But in what may be a small sign that things are at the brink of a turnaround elsewhere in the country, three of the major metropolitan areas studied — while still posting negative annual figures — did show some improvement over the declines reported last month. And eight of the 20 metro areas covered showed home-price growth in April from March.

No silver lining for major California metro areas; the drop was much worse than the national average, and worse than last month’s year-over-year report:

23.1% drop in Los Angeles home prices

22.4% drop in San Diego

22.1% drop in San Francisco

Only areas reporting worse declines were Phoenix (25%), Miami (26.7%), and Las Vegas (26.8%).

Please note that the index still shows that, since 2000, home values in Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco have still increased overall by 103%, 81%, and 65%, even after the collapse during the past year.

The US Dept of Commerce released residential construction data last week. Nationally, housing starts decreased May from April by 1.0%, and were down from a year ago by 41%. The picture in the western states is even worse. Single family home sales decreased by 18% since last month, and are down by nearly 50% year-over-year. This news adds more detail to the dire housing picture painted recently by Bob Rivinius.

Can’t make much good news out of this, except maybe we’re closer to the bottom.

Share this article: Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

Comment on this article


Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.