Now That Drug Cost Increases Must Be Explained in California . . .

David Crane
Lecturer and Research Scholar at Stanford University and President of Govern for California

Governor Jerry Brown just signed a bill requiring pharmaceutical companies in California to issue notifications at least 60 days in advance of a price increase that would be at least 16 percent over a two-year period and explain the reasons behind the increase. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, supporters of the legislation say it will discourage significant price increases.

I don’t know if the legislation will achieve its objective but if it does, perhaps the same approach should be employed to reduce the significant increases in retirement costs crushing California schools and other public services.Those costs are rising as fast or faster than pharmaceutical prices. For example, retirement costs in the San Francisco Unified School District grew more than 100 percent over five years, taking millions from classrooms and teacher salaries.

And similar growth at the state level is crowding out funding for courts, parks, the University of California, California State University and Social Services.

The cause wasand remainsself serving behavior by pension fund board members and elected officials abetted by a lack of transparency that hides the true size of liabilities (explained here) and the true costs of meeting those liabilities (explained here). Worse, the consequences of those costs are forced on to the most vulnerable members of our society (explained here).

It would be good for kids and other citizens if advance notification and truthful explanation could help save schools and other public services from rapidly rising pension and other retirement costs. Notification and truthful transparency would also be valuable for government employees at risk to default by certain governments, as explained here.

Share this article: Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

Comment on this article


Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.