State Government - As It Should Be

Antonio Villaraigosa's picture
Mayor of the City of Los Angeles

Year in and year out, it seems like our state faces the same predicament: An historic deficit; a deadlocked legislature; budget negotiations hijacked by a few hard-liners making unreasonable demands, and stalled by a two-thirds rule that impedes progress and weakens our ability to govern.

A few weeks ago – after the defeat of a series of measures designed to soften the blow of our budget shortfall – a coalition of mayors and city officials came together to call on our state representatives to follow a different path; to take responsibility for the public purse; to find a better way to navigate the choppy economic waters before us and lay the foundation for a stronger, more stable financial future.

Yesterday, we went back to our state capital to reiterate that same message – not as another special interest group and not to complain about circumstances, shrinking revenues, and a recession beyond our control. We returned to Sacramento as productive partners and concerned colleagues; as public servants ready to work together and offer viable solutions that ensure our financial stability and chart a course toward more responsible fiscal stewardship.

Over the course of our time in the Capitol, our meetings focused on two core principles:

First, any plan to withhold tax revenue from cities must be accompanied by a plan to get that money back in the coffers of local governments and back on local streets as soon as possible. Our willingness to sacrifice on the state’s behalf does not – and must not – represent an open-ended commitment or a blank check. These funds support vital programs and policies that benefit all Californians, and we must be sure that our hard-earned tax dollars make their way back to taxpayers as quickly as possible.

Second, we must minimize cuts to critical city services, like police departments and firefighters, emergency responders, road repair, and schools. As elected leaders, it is our duty to protect the central government services the people of California demand, deserve, and fund at the store and at the pump. And we will continue to fight tooth and nail to keep state resources flowing to neighborhoods, communities, and families throughout our state.

When all is said and done, we must recognize that there is no perfect solution to this perfect economic storm. But we can begin by turning our sights away from a short-sighted vision of government as it is – of leadership without direction; of elected officials accepting an unworkable status quo – and start thinking about government as it should be: A place that serves the best interests of every resident; that makes the common good its top priority; that charts a new course toward innovative ideas and sensible solutions; and that acts on the belief that its first responsibility is to the citizens and families it represents.

As I’ve said many times before, with every crisis comes an opportunity. This time is no different. We have the chance to make progress right now and to put our stamp on real reform. It is up to those of us in office – from the governor and mayors to city councilmembers and state lawmakers – to assume the mantle of bold, visionary leadership that benefits every resident. And if we do this right – if we make the necessary changes, shift our focus toward new ideas, and replace Sacramento’s culture of failure with new standards for success – we will resolve this crisis, emerge stronger from this recession, and leave a legacy of progress, stability, and responsibility to the next generation.

With regards to property tax

With regards to property tax and prop 13, most people don't know much about it except that fact they don't want to pay more. You stated, "Of course, Villaraigosa shows his true colors in his first paragraph by joining the chorus of voices calling Proposition 13 the boogeyman. Not that I would expect anything more. Never mind the fact that, as has been demonstrated recently here at Fox and Hounds, property tax revenue has been outpacing population growth adjusted for inflation since it's adoption." Ok! property tax in its entirety may have outpaced population growth as you have stated, however i would like to see that source of information for myself. What you and most 99.9 percent of Californians don't know is that for local government, property tax is small source of revenue. Property tax is split up so much to the different taxing entities of the local and state government (i.e parks districts, cities government, county government, schools, the state, other small special districts, etc)that money from property tax is very little for local governments. For example, if you had a $1 million home that was bought at market value, the law states (prop 13 that is) that the property tax will be 1 percent of that $1 million assessed valuation. 1 percent of $1 million is $10,000. However, that one percent is split of quite of bit to the local and state taxing entities. local governments typically get between 12% -15% of that 1 percent property tax amount. $10,000 property tax bill times 15% = $1,500. How many $1 million properties would you have to build to pay for 1 police officer who salary, benefits, and misc other costs = $125,000 and higher? Property tax in totality may generate a lot of tax revenue, but as for local governments, its very little. It is the main reason why local governments (cities) are focused on retail establishments development and new growth, because if the cost of providing services will continue to increase and if the revenues from growth do not occur, a city will die a slow and painful economic death as being experienced now.

You stated, "If the

You stated, "If the Republicans gave in sooner on approving the state budget, we would have run out of cash months and months ago-obviously this is a red herring. " That is subjective conjecture. The state is continually experiencing a revenue shortfalls. Just because at a specific point in time a budget is established, it doesn't mean it is okay and the coast is clear. Revenues will continue to decline well into the next year regardless of point-in-time budgets. You stated, "How about we start shutting down the CSU system and transfer many of their responsibilities to the junior college system-it is much more cost effective at delivering the same caliber of education?" More subjective conjecture. So lets assume the following, a student who attends a state school for their general education pays tuition upwards to $2000 per semester. Another student attending a community college school pays $20 per unit, give or take a couple of bucks. Full time cost would be 12 units x $20 = $240, which means that state of California will have to subsidize more money for the same education at a state school. $2,000 vs $240. You stated, "How about we make we make a sincere effort to root out Medical fraud?" I agree with that, but who would do the audit/fraud investigators that is aimed to reduce the fraud. If you hire more fraud investigators/auditors to ensure accountability, the taxpayers would have to pay for increased government services, which equals more money.

Finally...someone gets it!!!

Finally...someone gets it!!!

Opportunity from crisis

Hey Mayor, Thanks for the meaningless platitudes. What if we all give 110% to solve the states problems? I'd like to hear serious proposals for solving this problem. If the Republicans gave in sooner on approving the state budget, we would have run out of cash months and months ago-obviously this is a red herring. You can begin by streamlining the process of doing business with the city. I can't tell you how many times I have heard nightmares about the permitting process-how about YOU start there. How about we allow off shore drilling and collect tax revenue? The people along the coast are a narrow slice of the electorate with disproportionate influence. How about we go to a unicameral legislature? How about we start shutting down the CSU system and transfer many of their responsibilities to the junior college system-it is much more cost effective at delivering the same caliber of education? How about we make we make a sincere effort to root out Medical fraud? Solutions abound. Better come up with some good ideas because the days when Mexican-Americans like myself simply vote for the spanish surname on the ballot are coming to a close?

Does Fox and Hounds Daily have a TV camera or something?

Just what we all need. Ruminations from the 11% mayor.

Look, I can't fault mayor Villaraigosa for trying to defend his city against budget cutbacks from Sacramento. After all, that's his job. Funny how the threat of losing some money is able to drag the mayor away from the cameras for a few minutes.

Of course, Villaraigosa shows his true colors in his first paragraph by joining the chorus of voices calling Proposition 13 the boogeyman. Not that I would expect anything more. Never mind the fact that, as has been demonstrated recently here at Fox and Hounds, property tax revenue has been outpacing population growth adjusted for inflation since it's adoption.

Mayor Villaraigosa is just another in a long line of cash-grabbing, self-serving politicians. It doesn't matter to him that Californians are among the most taxed citizens in the country. He want's more.

Just what do you want the state to do Tony? (Other than raise more taxes, of course.) Do you even understand the fact that we're broke? Do you understand that a vast majority of Californians have come to realize that they are being taxed to death, and that they've had enough? I guess not since you so transparently use the word "reform" as a code for "more taxes", and to "kill the 2/3's rule."

Hey Tony, did the 2/3 rule stop the state from instituting an increase on what was already the highest state sales tax in the nation? Did the two thirds rule stop us from doubling the car tax? Did the two thirds rule stop us from having 2 of the top 3 state personal income tax rates in the nation? Did the two thirds rule keep us from being in the top five of tax burdened states in the nation?

I guess there is no such thing as enough for Mayor Villaraigosa when it comes to fleecing the taxpayers. I have a suggestion. Stick to being the pothole king.

the mayor

More B.S. from the mayor, no concrete proposals. We need the 2/3 majority to keep stupid state and local government spending under control. Rudy

Thanks for nothing, Mr. Mayor

Speaking as one of your Unreasonable Hard-Line Hijackers, I am not impressed by your finger-pointing, claims of innocence and saintly intentions. California government, by abandoning sound principles, has become a self-perpetuating parasite on the productive segment of society. Promising everything to everybody, without regard for the cost, is not my idea of good government. I think that is what the voters just told you, two to one.

Goverment is not the answer.

The only answer you think of Mr. Mayor is bigger government with more and more taxes. Forget it! Do with less, Mr. Mayor. Make your government smaller by reducing the waste, the duplication of effort, not by reducing the necessary services of fire and police. How many layers of local government do we need? How many departments of this and that do we need? Focus on the basics Mr. Mayor. The only opportunity is to FIX things, not grow government with more and more taxes. This sort of shameless spending and taxes send business out of our state, taking much needed jobs and tax revenue with them.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.