Orange County Cuts Planned Parenthood

Harvey Englander's picture
Managing Partner, Englander Knabe & Allen

I readily admit that I am old enough to remember the day in 1967 when Ronald Reagan signed a bill as governor of California supporting public funding of abortion for women in poverty.

While in the White House, Reagan assumed the required pro-life positions in order to keep and expand his base on the Christian Right. However, he never had a meeting in the White House with any of the pro-life organizations. They would have to stand outside at the foot of the Washington Monument, often in the rain, while Reagan spoke to them by telephone over a public address system. He was just a couple of blocks away in the Oval Office, but he understood the distance required between church and state.

The alleged Reagan Republican disciples who currently make up the Orange County Board of Supervisors decided a couple of weeks ago to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood; not for abortions, but for sex education programs in both public and private schools. Forty years later and the supes still haven’t gotten the message from their leader.

They cut off the organization’s annual funding of $290,000 for sex education, contraception and pre and post natal care for teenagers and mostly poor women, even though not a cent of the money goes for abortion. (Abortions are only 10% of the non-profit’s funding.)

The supervisors showed a gutless commitment at first by alluding to Planned Parenthood only as “that particular sub-contractor,” but then they rallied their courage by getting the red meat onto the council floor. After four of the five supervisors testified that Planned Parenthood was immoral under all circumstances and needed to be stopped, Chairwoman Patricia Bates buttoned the proceedings by informing the audience that she is a life-long Catholic and is “solid platinum pro-life.” She then summarily approved a measure to proceed with cutting Planned Parenthood’s funding. Nothing like a fair hearing.

There were over 2,200 unplanned pregnancies in Orange County last year and 56,000 cases of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), most of them by teens, many by the poor and uneducated, and all of them preventable.

Orange County’s enthusiastic welcome to President Obama last week by people across the entire political spectrum looked like an indication of the county’s politics finally growing into maturity. But, it could be that pregnant teenagers may well be growing up a lot faster than the members of the Board of Supervisors.

Thank you

This blog is a completely different take than all the others I've read, and you make some wonderful points that the Supervisors - and faith-based or anti-choice groups in general - should take into account. In response to a previous commenter, while the vote on Prop 4 was a close one, approximately 90% of Californian parents (http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=45186)- regardless of religion, political affiliation, or socio-economic status - support comprehensive sex education. So the Supervisors' vote is actually a far cry from reflecting the will of their electorate.

planned parenthood programs

"There were over 2,200 unplanned pregnancies in Orange County last year and 56,000 cases of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), most of them by teens, many by the poor and uneducated, and all of them preventable. " How long has Planned Parenthood been involved in the educational program? If it's been for longer than about 5 years, then it would appear that the almost $300,000 hasn't been spent particularly effectively. How many unplanned pregnancies were there _before_ the Planned Parenthood educational programs were in effect? How many of those unplanned pregnancies were in school age young women? Were both the pregnancies and the STDs "mostly" teens? Maybe the Supervisors need to find a more effective educational program...

"County's politics finally growing into maturity"?

Well, I suppose it's all in how you define "maturity". Several thousand people showing up to see our celebrity president is a poor measure of such things. Just five months ago, OC voters voted to support Prop 4 (parental notification for abortion) 54%/46%. Pulling money from sex ed is a debatable policy issue, but on abortion, the OC Supes are only following their electorate.

Bravo!

"Planned Parenthood was immoral under all circumstances and needed to be stopped"--------- I commend you for bringing this to light- My daughter works in the administration of Planned Parenthood and I have come to learn just how important their services are to many families living at or below the poverty line. Comments like the quoted one above, and "Chairwoman Patricia Bates buttoned the proceedings by informing the audience that she is a life-long Catholic and is 'solid platinum pro-life.'"------ simply have no place in a Constitutional system based on Separation of Church and State, and are ignorant, biased and damn foolish, to boot. I would like to see people like this step up and put their money where their mouth is and support the unwanted children they urge people who cannot afford large families to have - further, these are the very same people, when the unwanted kid grows up and robs the liquor store and kills the clerk, who agitate for the death penalty without a second thought - pure hypocrisy. This is not about religion; it is about protecting people from STD's which are at epidemic proportions among teens today; it is also about allowing important services to be properly funded for those who need and want them - nobody is making Ms. Bates do anything against her religious beliefs, but, hers is not the only religious belief existing among 6.7 billion of us on the planet, and some believe religion is superstitious nonsense too, and their beliefs are just as protected by our Constitution as Ms. Bates' beliefs. Your article does a real service to the community - shame on those bigots hiding under cover of religion!



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.