Memo to the Special Session: Taxes have already been raised on business this year

Loren Kaye's picture
President of the California Foundation for Commerce and Education

The sun rose this morning, the Cubs are not in the World Series, and California’s budget is in crisis. All may not be well with the world, but we can count on some things remaining constant.

Also predictable: renewed positioning for new taxes to solve the budget deficit.

But if the Governor calls the Legislature into special session next month to address the deficit, they should be mindful that this year’s budget was predicated on nearly $6 billion in new or accelerated taxes on California businesses and investors. When it comes to taxing California’s employers, they gave at the office.

What are the tax changes?

  • A two-year limit on the ability of businesses to use most business tax credits, including research and development, capping those credits at one-half of the taxpayer’s tax liability, costing businesses about $900 million. This tax credit limitation will result in increased taxes for companies currently relying upon California’s only remaining statewide investment incentive tax credits, research and development and enterprise zone credits.
  • Suspends for two years the ability of businesses to deduct net operating losses, costing businesses $1.6 billion over two years. This change will directly affect marginally profitable businesses attempting to emerge from losses.
  • Business taxpayers must pay more of their estimated taxes earlier in the year, which will raise about $2.3 billion. This will reduce cash flow for independent contractors and other businesses, small and large, in the first half of the year.
  • Limited liability companies (LLC) must pay their annual fees at least six months earlier this year, and will suffer a 10% penalty if they underestimate their fees, costing these companies $360 million. The new fee deadline will result in a double payment of the fee in the early part of 2009, which may pose a hardship for small companies with limited cash flow.
  • A new 20% strict liability penalty in addition to all existing penalties, which applies to “understatements” of tax liability of $1 million or more, which is estimated to raise $1.5 billion from businesses. Unlike most existing state and federal penalties, there is no “reasonable cause” exception, which makes this penalty applicable even to reasonable tax payer behavior where there is no culpability. This will force companies to overpay their taxes by May 2009 and subsequent years to include amounts reasonably in dispute, in order to ensure no 20% penalty.

Some offsetting reforms were adopted to mitigate the damage of the tax increases in several years, but for at least the duration of the economic contraction, many companies investing in jobs and operations in California – or who are attempting to emerge from their own contraction – will suffer higher tax bills.

Good Article

Great article on how California taxes are raised regularly, thus driving small business owners out of CA or out of business - period.

business taxes

There is a simple solution to the increase in business taxes. Move your business to another state, conduct business on line, or best of all do what the Liberals have instituted, driving businesses to off shore facilities and decreasing job opportunities so that they can rale about how jobs have left the country and you need us for change. It has been the Liberal agenda that has caused business decline in the U.S. Over regulation on all sorts of areas and enviornmental restrictions have made doing business (manufacturing) in the U.S. impossible. What is just plain stupid is that the off shore countries have no regulations so the pollutions still go up in the air and into the water and eventually find their way to North America. Here we establish laws with fines, so willingly break the laws and pay the fines. What is better to have this type of activity or to reward companies that find solutions. No, a solution will not generate fine revenues for government so this is not an avenue that government will even encourage. Sad.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.