For Obama, the Acorn Doesn’t Fall Far From the Tree

Matt Klink's picture
Republican political consultant specializing in issues management and strategic public affairs

Here’s a troubling pattern for the Barack Obama – one that should scare the pants off of most Americans. Barack Obama, who since his earliest days has been and remains attracted to a radical, activist, left-leaning agenda, has associated himself with some really shady characters and organizations that don’t share Main Street American values.

And, when these ties are exposed, Senator Obama at first attempts to minimize the situation or attack those raising the claims…but when attacking or minimizing proves unsuccessful, Obama casts these “connections” aside and quickly attempts to distance himself.

America first witnessed this with Obama’s handling of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright situation. When statements made by Obama’s pastor of 20-years grew too problematic, the Senator attempted to calm the fury by making a speech about race relations in the U.S. The left fawned over the “chosen one” for his prophetic comments. Main Street America yawned. When the fury over Wright’s “God d*mn America” comments wouldn’t pass, Obama said, “See ya” to his friend.

Most recently, Obama appears to have weathered the storm over his close connections to American-born terrorist William Ayers largely by ignoring them...and the elitist media gave him a pass.

Now, with mainstream newspapers, television, radio shows, blogs and Internet filled with troubling assertions about voter fraud and the inextricable involvement of ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), Obama faces a new and more serious controversy. The Illinois Senator needs to address this issue and his long-time, close ties to this questionable group.

According to hundreds, if not thousands of media reports, ACORN activists have registered the Dallas Cowboys, Mickey Mouse and other notable cartoon characters, and even the dead to vote. Thousands of other instances of voter fraud in key battleground states are now bubbling to the surface. With vote fraud allegations against ACORN in Seattle, St. Louis, Kansas City, Cleveland, New Mexico, Wisconsin and other states, Barack Obama’s ties to ACORN need to be examined and explained in much greater detail.

Will he support his former employer’s suspicious and questionable activities? Will he ignore the situation and hope it goes away? Will he distance himself?

To further complicate matters and to demonstrate Obama’s lack of Main Street values, there’s a YouTube video of a 2007 Obama interview at a community organizing convention. In this segment, Obama promises that community organizations (like ACORN) would be granted unprecedented access to help a “President Obama” set the agenda even before he is sworn into office. That’s a truly scary endeavor for a centrist America given these organizations' radical, socialist-leaning agenda.

ACORN leaders have claimed that they “want a new America.” Barack Obama has gone to great lengths to position himself as a different type of politician. ACORN’s and Obama’s “new” and “different” desires should give all of us pause.

Equally important, Senator Obama’s inextricable links to the most radical of radical individuals and organizations belies his thin claims of centrism...and call into question what Obama truly believes at his core...because that’s where an Obama Administration would end up philosophically and from a public policy perspective.

Give the Obama presidential campaign credit. They have masterfully positioned their candidate in the political center. But, Barack Obama is no moderate. He’s an unrepentant extremist-liberal masquerading in centrist clothing to get elected.

With three weeks, America needs to know the real Barack Obama. It remains to be seen if the McCain campaign is capable of effectively telling this story. Thankfully, ACORN is helping to accomplish this task.

ACORN - Bi-Partisan?

Folks......regarding ACORN......they have a pac commitee AND they held a conference in June or July of 2008 where they announced their support of Mr. obama. This is OUR tax money going to a supposed BI-Partisan organization who is to not demonize any party and focus on specifically getting people registered and help them get to the voting polls......not to tell them who to vote for, or how many times they can vote or to offer material incentives, etc..... I know that things in this country will never be perfect but these types of actions are what poisons our fundamentals and will ultimately bring this country down. We must all hold each other accountable and be responsible. Something that our Congress is NOT right now and a very fundamental reason we are in the economic turmoil PHASE we are currently in..... However, we are Americans and we have faced worse issues and shown the world why we continue to be the best even with moments of time where we have poor representations of leadership...

Matt Klink

Matt Klink, is he related to Col.Klink of Hogan's Heroes? Our country is in the mess it is because during our last two Presidential elections, fear was the motivator, 9-11 and who was better prepared to protect us. So far we have lost over 4,000 of our bravest fighting men and women we are no safer today then before 9-11. So pleeeeze lets focus on how we will turn around our country, it will take a joint effort of all of us Dems and reps, we are all Americans first and conservative and liberal secondly. On the matter of taxes, if you wrap yourself in the flag of our country and say you support the troops, how in the hell do you provide the materiale that will keep our brave men and women in the best possible equipment. I for one am proud to pay my taxes to a country that has help me achieve success from a humble and poor beginning.

Fear mongering?

Al Capone was a nice guy who just had bad friends, is that it? What is being discussed in this article is attempting to discern a candidate's character and judgment. Sarah Palin hasn't been found legally "guilty" of abuse of power, a politically inspired "report" has been issued making that accusation. But you found it necessary to point it out in an attempt to play down the "extremist-liberal masquerading in centrist clothing" as if it's nothing to be concerned about. Mr. Obama's previous actions and associations indicate the kind of person he is and what we can expect from an Obama presidency. No one expects "the immaculate politician", at least no one that has paid any attention to politics in this country in the last few decades. However, someone trying to sell himself as something he is definately not, to get elected, is deception, and someone who will deceive you to achieve their goals is not to be trusted. Anyone who will attempt to disassociate themselves from long time friends and supporters to achieve their goals cannot be trusted to hold to any "policy or pragmatic plans" they have indicated they would follow. Your lecturing comments indicate you would be happy with a coin toss to decide, as all politicians have "dirtied their hands" but your defense of Obama indicates otherwise. I believe there is a difference between dirtying your hands planting a garden, and planting seeds of deceit.

ACORN actually reported the

ACORN actually reported the strange registrations to the voter registrar so it wasn't as if they were keeping it secret. Further, John McCain spoke before ACORN in March 2006. Are you besmurching his character?

and by the way, what does

and by the way, what does 1968 mean to you...personally?

Fear Mongering?

Please! Trent Lott was run out of the Senate, largely because of a personal remark he made to a fellow Senator because, if reconstructed, it had possible indirect racial overtones. Senator Allen of Virginia left the Senate because of the use of a term that very few Americans knew and even fewer were aware was considered racist (macaca). That is, until the media jumped on it, talked about it 24/7, and managed to influence the election. There are scores of investigators in Alaska trying to dig up stuff in Palin's past to hit her over the head with it. Did you care who GWB cavorted with when he was younger (as well as his daughters), or did you let that slide? When something comes out about a person's character or lack thereof, liberals call it "Swift-Boating". If Gore had admitted that he lied about the internet, Love Story, etc., if Kerry had admitted making up the stuff about being in Cambodia and if Obama would come clean about his associations and reliance on his unseemly cast of characters, they all would have been more palatable candidates. As it is, they will (and have) pull the wool over the less sophisticated voters, but the rest of us will eschew them, again.

Fear mongering.

If politicians literally distanced themselves from every person espousing a different attitude or calling for something new, they wouldn't be attached to anyone. I'd say that would make them poor politicians by definition.

You are asking for a politician that has never dirtied their hands, who has never stood out amongst the crowd, and who has never stepped out against tradition - these are not people, they are illusions. Or worse, they're real life zealots defending what is for the sake of defending it. The best example I can leave you to represent where that logic leads to is Islamic extremism. They defend tradition for the sake of tradition and religion with their lives. Your fear of change is natural, but your utter disgust in it is little more than traditional zealotry.

Personally, I look forward to the day when candidates admit they have made errors in judgment, prove that they've grown from those experiences, and learned to apply these experiences to new policy options. I am sick of hoping for the immaculate politician, and articles like this one, which point out how afraid voters should be due to affiliations cement my distaste for the 24-hour newscycle & this perfect political savior. Every human savior proves their humanity once the first bone is unearthed from their buried pasts.

I think the closest we've had to immaculate politicians are people like Sarah Palin and Barack Obama. One has been found guilty of abusing power, and the other is barraged for being an "extremist-liberal masquerading in centrist clothing."

The last masquerade I voted in - President Bush promised a man of the people would lead us - sadly, he was right. A man of the people is not what I want from my leaders. I don't want a sports icon, or a newscaster, or a soccer mom. I want the elite - the BEST our country has to offer. If anything, our parties have FAILED us time and time again with these clumsy politicians they position to lead our country. Bring me the elite and let me choose from amongst the finest, not the package that looks the finest.

My final point is this - a person is singular, and should be held responsible for their own actions, not the actions of those who affiliate themselves with that person. I don't know the extent of Senator Obama's connection with ACORN, but I find it suspect that you feel a small group of extreme liberals would be capable of making large-scale policy changes. I know President Bush has tried to make the Executive Branch policymakers but if he didn't succeed after 9/11 - I highly doubt Mr. Obama will be capable of changing everything.

Stop fear mongering and help your fellow Americans critically analyze policy or pragmatic plans - fostering fear does little but paralyze our country.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.