Pay Cut Decision is a No-Brainer

Joel Fox
Editor of Fox & Hounds and President of the Small Business Action Committee

I’m no legal scholar, but Attorney General Jerry Brown’s decision yesterday to allow for an 18 percent salary cut for the state’s lawmakers and constitutional officers was a political no-brainer. The budget is in woeful deficit, unemployment is at record levels, public employees are on furlough – of course, the state lawmakers must share the pain.

The fact that legislators tried to avoid the pay cut during these difficult times separates them even further from average citizens. Legislators claim their fingerprints are not on the request seeking the opinion on the legality of the cuts. The administrators of the Senate and Assembly made the request to Brown. Right. And, I’m prepared to buy that bridge in Brooklyn.

The state’s independent pay commission authorized the cut in May. Commission chairman Charles Murray, in agreeing with the attorney general’s opinion, said on this issue, “We represent the average Californian.”

He’s right. The proof is the result of the only ballot measure that passed at the May special election.

Proposition 1F prohibited the state commission from increasing salaries of the legislature and top government officials if the state general fund is expected to end the year with a deficit. The measure passed overwhelming 74% to 26% at a time when all other measures on the ballot were rejected. (Full disclosure: I signed the ballot argument in favor of the measure.)

California has been running deficits on a constant basis for years despite what the signed budget says on paper. The commission has the right to make this pay cut decision and the attorney general was right to support that decision.

Share this article: Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

Comment on this article


Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.