More Oversight, Not Less, Needed for High Speed Rail 

Morris Brown
Founder of DERAIL, a grassroots effort against the California high-speed rail Project

At the Thursday (4/28/2016) meeting of the High Speed Rail Authority board, at which the 2016 Business Plan was approved, Chair Dan Richard made the comment:

Both because the recommendations from the peer review group and actually with our supporting this notion of stronger or I would say more visible legislative oversight

Video link here:

The hard truth of the matter is revealed in actions the Authority has taken to reduce, not increase oversight.

Last year, through a budget trailer bill, the Authority managed to reduce reporting requirements from twice a year to once every two years.

Then this year, when a call for an audit of the Authority was proposed, the Joint Legislative Audit committee Chair, Mike Gibson, received a letter  from CEO Jeff Morales, urging no audit be started.

Such an audit is clearly needed.  Questions around the 31% ($9.5 billion) increase in building from Merced to Burbank down south, which were revealed only in a hidden report, need to be addressed.

Actions always speak louder than words.  Just where are the needed actions from the Authority to increase oversight, rather than weaken and reduce oversight?

Comment on this article


Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.