California Initiative Editorial Scorecard #5

Joe Rodota and Matt Klink
Joe Rodota is CEO of Forward Observer and Matt Klink is a Partner at California Strategies

Forward Observer and Klink Campaigns developed the 2018 California Initiative Editorial Scorecard to keep track of editorials for and against the 11 statewide initiatives on this November’s ballot. We will update the scorecard weekly with ballot measure endorsements (pro and con) from the top 20 California newspapers by circulation. The fifth edition of the California Initiative Editorial Scorecard is based on 164 editorials thus far.

The following excerpts are from endorsement editorials that appeared online or in print since our last edition:

Proposition 3

Los Angeles Times – No

“Proposition 3 is not merely a request for money, but an effort to force taxpayers all across the state to pay costs that ought to be borne by the private or regional interests that will benefit. That kind of cost-shifting isn’t always easy to spot in a bond measure. In this case it is.” Link

Palm Springs Desert Sun – No

“Proposition 3 is pay-to-play legislation, with large chunks of its funding earmarked for agencies whose planned use of the funds would almost solely benefit large private firms. Those who agreed to help fund the initiative’s promotion are in line for big payouts from its proceeds. California should be drawing up and funding key infrastructure water projects primarily based on those who benefit paying the lion’s share of costs rather than lumping another massive sum, yet again, on all state taxpayers.” Link

Proposition 5

Ventura County Star – No

“Prop. 13 created two classes of Californians – an older gentry of longtime property owners with low tax rates, and younger generations that may be paying twice as much tax for the same house next door. It’s hard to imagine Prop. 5 not widening that gap.” Link

Proposition 6

Palm Springs Desert Sun – No

“Rather than stop the numerous projects already being funded and that have gotten underway thanks to SB1, state voters should reject the cynical repeal measure that is Proposition 6 and keep the ball rolling when it comes to better roads.” Link

Proposition 7

Ventura County Star – Yes

“That said, we must concede we’ve grown weary of the twice-yearly changing of our clocks. Now that the issue has advanced to the ballot with bipartisan support, we think Prop. 7 merits a yes vote.” Link

Proposition 10

Ventura County Star – No

“The main reason for California’s affordable housing shortage is simple: too much demand and not enough supply. Prop. 10 does nothing to address that disparity and indeed could make it worse.” Link

Comment on this article


Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.