A Southern California Test of Obama Promises

Joe Mathews's picture
Journalist and Irvine senior fellow at the New America Foundation. He is co-author of California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It (UC Press, 2010).

The president elect has promised change, we all know that. He's promised to get beyond old disputes and divides. And he's pledged to rebuild the country's infrastructure and stimulate the economy. That all sounds great, but I'll believe these promises when I see them. And there's a perfect place for Southern Californians to test whether Obama means any of this.

It's called the 710- aka the Long Beach Freeway.

For a half-century, the 710 has been unfinished. It was supposed to go all the way from the Port of Long Beach up to Pasadena, where it would connect to the 210 Freeway, allowing drivers and truckers to skirt downtown LA on their way northwest (to the San Fernando Valley, Santa Clarita, the Antelope Valley or even the Central Valley). But the highway stops 6 miles short of the 210 in Pasadena, dumping drivers onto the surface streets of Alhambra. Why? The power of one very well organized special interest: the residents and city fathers of South Pasadena.

For decades, South Pasadena has blocked this last bit of the interstate highway system with legal and other appeals. South Pasadenans know that the freeway would go through the center of their town, making it a much louder, less pleasant place. Of course, their actions have made other cities in the region louder, less pleasant places. The people of nearby Alhambra and Pasadena (disclosure: Pasadena's my hometown) have made clear they want the freeway to no avail.

This is a classic case of the needs of the few frustrating the needs of the many. The 710 is the main transportation artery out of America's largest port, the Port of Long Beach. It'd be a big boost for commerce if the freeway didn't abruptly end before its destination. Truckers are instead forced onto other freeways, clogging traffic - and slowing the business and personal lives of others. And with the country requiring an economic boost, there's no better time than right now to get construction started. This isn't a bridge to nowhere-it's a vital transportation link in the middle of a metropolitan area. And you want to talk shovel-ready? The 710 has been waiting for shovels to finish it for 50 years.

Coverage of the dispute focuses on the decision-making of state transportation officials, and the role of local bond money in paying for it. But this is fundamentally a federal issue, and Obama has a role to play in forcing this project forward. In 2003, the Federal Highway Administration rescinded its approval of the 710's route, thus removing federal pressure to build the project. The Obama administration needs to go back and get that same route re-approved, immediately. Ultimately, it may be that South Pasadena can be saved by building this extension with a tunnel, not an above-ground freeway. But without the leverage of strong federal support for finishing the 710, nothing will ever happen.

It's time for change, for an end to this long-running dispute, and for some freeway construction we can believe in.

710

Being from New Jersey, but traveling on business to LA six times a year, there are plenty of options such as taking the I-5 or the I-10. The return on investment is not going to be there with this project, considering all of the houses that need to be torn down. One more six-mile highway is not going to have a dramatic or even moderate effect on traffic. Don't know much about South Pasadena, but have heard it's a good place.

Bring in the Federal Govt to settle local hash?

And what if the residents of So Pas further resist the destruction of their town? What then? Troops? Send in the tanks? A whiff of grapeshot? Pull up their lawn signs? Just how does one make people understand that when it comes to the will of the central government your little quality of life dreams are of no concern whatsoever? If this doesn't sound like SCAG's wet dream, what does? Fortunately I do not think Barack Obama is politically obtuse eneough to hand the San Gabriel Valley back over to the GOP.

Briliant...

Lets spend 110 million dollars on soil studies while they lay off teachers and cut public school funding throughout the area of Pasadena, South Pasadena, and San Marino. I would hope that the new administration puts OUR money where it will generate the highest return not on some project that makes it easier for you to get to china town for dim sum faster.

The 710 link proposal is now

The 710 link proposal is now for a tunnel that would bore right under South Pas, with no exits in the city and no impact on surface traffic. It is even different from the old cut-and-cover concept that South Pas opposed, which would have required temporarily removing entire neighborhoods and replacing them over the freeway trench, because the new proposal keeps the entire freeway below ground, like a subway tunnel. But some in South Pas still oppose it. I think they have been fighting it for so long it has become force of habit for them now.

710 Freeway

President Obama would show his mettle by rejecting the 710 boondoggle in favor of regional logistics centers, improved use of rail and other solutions to move goods from Southern California's ports. Supporting the 710 extension would not only destroy neighborhoods but would perpetuate the flawed planning strategies that have created congestion, pollution and a lower quality of life for California. Pouring tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars down the failed freeway black hole is the opposite of what President Obama, or any leader, should do.

oh boy

if there's anything that our experience has proven, its that new freeways do NOT reduce congestion. traffic merely expands to fill the new space. i have an idea. instead of destroying one of the few transit friendly, well planned success stories in the region, why don't we invest the money and time in light rail and clean fuel buses, and complete the full alameda corridor project to take traffic off the streets? the fact is that most port traffic terminates at the railheads south of the 710 termination and that bulldozing south pas wouldn't help commerce that much anyway. the real issue is single commuter vehicles. so what you are proposing is wiping out a walkable city with light rail links for the sake of people alone in their cars. great idea. that'll show them.

Great, now every time

Great, now every time someone wants to build some more concrete crap they'll misuse Obama's call for infrastructure enhancement to bolster their insatiable need for speed in the Greater L.A. sprawl.

South Pasadena is one of the few great small communities left in the area which hasn't been eviscerated by a freeway.

If you want more speed, drink more coffee. Starbucks needs the busniess.

Signed,

Former SoPas resident now living in the Lovely Concrete Encrusted Inland Empire with a Freeway On-ramp & Starbucks on Every Corner

710 Freeway extension

50 years and no end in sight. Welcome to the fight for permits for wind mills, solar power plants, nuclear plants and maybe a refinery somewhere in the US. If Teboone Pickens, the great promoter of wind mills does not want any of them on his own ranch in Texas, but anywhere else throughout the country, Ted Kennedy defeat the wind mill out in the ocean off Nantucket, how then will the ordinary citizens welcome any of the above mentioned in his backyard?

But isn't South Pas a really

But isn't South Pas a really nice area? Seems a shame to destroy yet another great neighborhood for a cement monstrosity.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.