Cowards, Bullies and Bluffs

Joe Mathews's picture
Journalist and Irvine senior fellow at the New America Foundation. He is co-author of California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It (UC Press, 2010).

Hiram Johnson, the famous early 20th century California governor who was elected as a Republican only to ditch the party less than two years later for a new Progressive Party, was fond of saying this: “You can’t make a man a coward by pointing a pistol at his head. You can only prove him a coward.”

Johnson was defending the concept of a recall of elected officials and judges. (President Taft had spoken out against the idea of adding a recall provision to the California constitution, and Johnson had to defend the recall in the successful 1911 campaign to add direct democracy to the state constitution.

I’ve been thinking about Hiram’s comment as California politics melts down into a lava sea of bitter threats. Labor types are threatening to recall or end the political careers of Democrats they don’t like—and demanding criminal investigation of Republican lawmakers engaged in the usual political horse-trading. The Republican party has countered with threats to excommunicate lawmakers who even contemplate voting for tactics. And some talk show hosts (several of whom face declining ratings and relevance in this era) are demanding “heads on sticks” for lawmakers who vote for taxes.

The threats don’t bother me. They’re a good sign—entrenched interests on left and right actually feel threatened. The threats are a sign of weakness. What’s maddening is the soft, weak, cowering public response of the lawmakers being threatened. That response reveals them as cowards. And as politically tone deaf.

These threats are a heaven-sent opportunity for those being threatened, if they screw up a little courage and fight back. Any Democrat targeted by labor would be wise to stand up and say something like, “While I believe very much in representing working people, I represent all the voters of my district, and I won’t be intimidated by them. And I won’t so much as take a call of any representative of a group threatening me until they issue an apology for their words. These kinds of threats aren’t worthy of a great state.”

On the other hand, Republicans being targeted should go hard back at the party and the talk show hosts. Denounce the threats as un-American and not worthy of Republicans. They might argue that it’s a strange sort of party that wants its members to back down at the slightest threat. (That wouldn’t seem to fit the Republican self-image). And above all, show no fear. The proper response, “If the Republican party wants to take action against me for voting for what I feel is best for the state – which is what my constituents elected me to do – go ahead and make my day.” Good to practice the steely, Eastwood-style glare when delivering that last line.

The bottom line is: Punch the labor and GOP bullies in the mouth. Voters will appreciate the toughness. And it says here that when the pistol is pointed back at those making the threats, we may discover that some of them will be proven cowards.

Is there a Republican Party?

Outside of taxes is there a single issue left for the GOP? Oh, right, keeping gay people from marrying. It's getting to the point where 'Republican' is more a body type than a political party. Could you imagine what would happen if the CA GOP could somehow scrape together its manhood and take an opposing stance on an issue of importance to voters in this state? How about the forcing of high-density development into towns that don't want it? When it comes to that one, the Democrats are in so deep they need a straw to breath. Most folks aren't all that happy about it, and really are looking for some kind of political leadership on the issue So where is the GOP on this one? Not that I'm holding out any hope.

There you go again, Jon

There you go again, Jon, off the rails to the far right. What is it you don't understand about trashing the members of your own party? How does trashing the members of your own party for their trying to do the right thing by the people of the state help make the Republican Party a majority? In my estimation, all you are doing, Jon, is making the Republican Party a laughingstock in this state. Way to go, Jon.

Talk Show Hosts help working people

Mr. Mathews, "And some talk show hosts (several of whom face declining ratings and relevance in this era) are demanding “heads on sticks” for lawmakers who vote for taxes" California workers are one of the highest taxed in the country, increasing taxes will continue to erode the quality of life of the working taxpayers of the state. What talk show hosts such as John and Ken are doing is commendable, I sincerely doubt that their ratings are declining and I find it amusing that you think they are becoming irrelevant in this era; you may be wealthy enough not to suffer any negative consequences from increased taxes, but to a lot of the working people in CA, fighting back tax increasing is extremely relevant. Regards, Mark.

UnAmerican?

I think that the influence of political parties is an important part of American tradition, Joe. I also believe that political parties have an obligation and role to play in lobbying, carrot or stick, legislators who are members of the party, and who rely on party resources in their elections. It’s fine that non-partisan types like you see the situation in Sacramento as one calling for a grand compromise, but the reality is that Californians are burdened with the highest taxes in the country. Overspending should not be rewarded with higher revenues. Anyways, from a political perspective the Republican Party is the party OUT OF POWER – in the minority. Our priority is to become the majority party. You may think that a compromise, where Republicans cede the taxes issue, is a grand idea. But from where I sit, it deals a crippling blow to the GOP’s ability to present a contrasting policy view from the Democrats. It sounds like you would be happiest if we had a one-party system in this country -- the American Party, I guess you would call it.



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.