Doomed to failure? Let's not be so quick to judge.

Joel Fox's picture
Editor of Fox & Hounds and President of the Small Business Action Committee

In response to Joe Mathews' piece today in which he concludes that Redistricting is doomed to failure, I think there are enough differences in this November’s redistricting initiative effort that it does have a chance of passing.

The Democratic Party has officially come out against the measure, but they'll have their hands full explaining their position. On one hand, they are trumpeting the campaign of Barack Obama who calls for change and undoing the old partisan wars, and on the other, they are defending the status quo of a very partisan current redistricting system.

And, the campaign for the initiative won’t seem as partisan as some Democratic Party leaders will try to make it. A number of groups that often align themselves with the Democrats have endorsed this initiative. So have some visible Democratic politicians such as Steve Westly, and I don’t think he will be the only one.

Political scientists often say that when voters look around at measures they are not sure about, they often take a cue from endorsements they trust. In this case, many Democratic voters will respect the opinion of these groups and individual Democratic leaders who choose to endorse the measure.

History says that your conclusion is right, Joe, since so many redistricting reform measures have failed in California in the past. However, this year could be different. This redistricting initiative will be a good test to see if “change” is truly in the air.

Wolf in Sheep's Clothing

Democrats need about five seconds to explain their principled NO position on this initiative: * It is being funded by six-figure donations from special interest groups, including a Texas oilman who also happened to fund the Swift Boat veterans ads; * It gives parity to Republicans on a commission, despite their significant registration disadvantage; * It will virtually eliminate legislative districts represented by African-Americans, and greatly reduce those represented by Latinos; * It puts a bureaucrat in charge of the process, and consists of a commission that's not accountable to any voters. And I"m just warming up.

Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.