How to repeal the two-thirds budget vote requirement

Loren Kaye's picture
President of the California Foundation for Commerce and Education

With the state budget now more than 50 days late, the usual suspects have again lined up to decry the two-thirds vote requirement to pass the state budget. But the problem isn’t a late budget – it’s an unbalanced, undisciplined budget.

The typical defense of the supermajority vote is that it promotes consensus and restrains overspending or tax increases. But in practice it has done neither: taxes are already checked by a two-thirds vote, and spending has obviously not been constrained by the budget vote hurdle.

So maybe the time has come to jettison the two-thirds budget vote, and replace it with some legitimate budget reforms that would actually control spending. After all, the fundamental cause of the budget debacle has been persistent bankrolling of workload budgets that have exceeded even extravagant revenue increases: to illustrate, a 44% increase in General Fund tax revenues between 2003 and 2007 was not enough to cover all the spending demands.

Let the voters decide whether to repeal the two-thirds budget vote requirement, but at the same time the Legislature should place on the ballot constitutional amendments to:

  • Enact a mandatory budget reserve that can only be used when revenues collapse.
  • Repeal or suspend all automatic program inflation adjustments and rate increases that are not currently in the Constitution.
  • Create a mandatory retirement program for new state employees that provides sufficient pensions at lower costs to both employees and taxpayers.
  • Rationalize the state’s obligation for retiree health and dental benefits to stem the enormous future costs of these benefits.

Removing these spending drivers and cushioning revenue shortfalls will enable legislators of both parties in both houses to debate budget goals with fewer preconditions. The absence of a two-thirds vote might even result in cross-party coalitions to support priorities for, say, higher education or public works, rather than seeing those items fall to the bottom of the list while financing for other programs or functions automatically escalate.

Repeal 2/3 vote requirement for Budget

Do not EVER repeal the 2/3 requirement for the Budget. That is a very bad idea. We already have firm limits in the Constitution such as the budget MUST be ready on or about 1 July. The budget MUST be balanced. It is apparent that the Democrats have not followed either of these two limits. Why would anyone believe they would follow more limits. I'm all for imposing the new limits, but they will never be honored.

Repealing 2/3 vote requirement

In addition to Loren's good points, real redistricting reform would also be helpful. When politicians are actually accountable to voters, then the can be trusted to do the peoples' business with regard to budgets and other important public policies.

Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.