A Switcheroo for Tom Campbell?

Tony Quinn's picture
Political Commentator and Former Legislative Staffer

The San Francisco Chronicle’s Carla Marinucci reported recently that Tom Campbell may be dropping out of the governor’s race to run for the US Senate against Sen. Barbara Boxer. If this is true, it could be a blockbuster event in campaign 2010.

Campbell’s thinking seems driven by two realities; he doesn’t have enough money to compete in the GOP gubernatorial primary, and the nomination may be worthless anyway as some polling shows Attorney General Jerry Brown poised to win in a landslide.

But if he shifts to the Senate contest, he will have one huge impact – and it is not his nomination, but that of Assemblyman Chuck Devore. A Campbell candidacy probably finishes off the GOP establishment favorite, businesswoman Carly Fiorina. Her base is among the Silicon Valley GOP types, as is Campbell’s, and with the declining Republican Party in California, there is simply not room for two Silicon Valley Republicans.

Devore is on the right wing fringe of California politics, and his soulmates have regularly been trounced when running statewide. Former Sen. Dick Mountjoy received only 35 percent against Sen. Dianne Feinstein in 2006, but GOP registration has noticeably declined since 2006. It is now at an historical low at under 31 percent, and it is very questionable if Devore, who has insignificant financial resources, would even do as well in 2010 as Mountjoy did in 2006.

So Devore is no threat to Boxer, unlike Fiorina who has the support of the GOP establishment in Washington D.C. and can be expected to mount a heavily funded effort if she is the nominee.

That means the Democrats will have to spend upwards of $20 million saving Boxer, who would normally be safe. But if she is lucky enough to face Devore, she is home free and that $20 million can be spent elsewhere.

That is the key. Democrats are beside themselves right now that the 60 votes they have in the US Senate is not really 60 because it includes the likes of Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Connecticut) and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska. But Democrats have a chance to add to their 60 by picking up open Republican Senate seats in New Hampshire, Florida, Missouri and Ohio in 2010. If they can pull this off, bills like the single payer health care public option and the carbon tax to save the planet that are out of reach now could be passed in 2011.

But Democrats also have to defend their own seats in 2010, and some incumbents such as Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nevada) and Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Arkansas) are in trouble. If they have to spend an additional $20 million defending Boxer from the likes of Fiorina, funding the races to pick up additional seats will be much more difficult.

Campbell has already run unsuccessfully for the US senate twice (1992 and 2000) – receiving only 37 percent in his last race.. While he can make a plausible case in the gubernatorial primary (he actually does understand the budget), he has no case to make as a candidate for the US Senate. But if he keeps Fiorina from the nomination, he may play an historic role in helping the Democrats pass their very liberal agenda in 2011.

I am supporting Meg Whitman

I am supporting Meg Whitman for governor. If Tom Campbell switches to the US Senate race, I will support him!

Can you say, Democrat reporter?

The only thing wrong about this column (besides the text) is the header. It should read "Political Commentator and Former Legislative Staffer-AKA DEMOCRATIC SHILL". Tony has truly missed the outrage of California voters concerning Boxer. The 'senator' has insulted the military, never saw a tax she didn't like and can't wait for a government takeover of one fifth of the economy ala health care reform. The only way she could re-elected is if we get another Obama type bait and switch campaign run by the media. ANYBODY, even a RINO would be better than Boxer!

DeVore

Tony Quinn makes a good point, up to a point. He is right that a Campbell candidate would be good for DeVore as the 2 RINOs (Republican In Name Only)would split the vote. (is every republican from Silicon Valley a RINO). However, Quinn misreads the anger in the electorate over the cost and growth of the federal government, and in CA's case the state government as well. People are pissed and Pete Wilson type RINO Republicanism of government solutions are the answer but we can do it better than Gray Davis DOESN'T WORK. Hope and Change of allowing more individual liberties, lower taxes, less government interference is what people are looking for. Devore is for freedom, Boxer is the one that wants to tell your doctor if and when to do that medical procedure. I will stick to freedom and liberty.

Campbell..Senate

You're kidding, right? Making this comment about Tom Campbell? That "he has no case to make as a candidate for the US Senate." Tom is brighter that almost everyone on Capitol Hill, especially every Republican. He also has a better grasp of the issues. He has dignity, intellect, integrity. He puts his constituents ahead of party. What kind of case would you support against such a genuine and good leader with an impeccable track record?



Please note, statements and opinions expressed on the Fox&Hounds Blog are solely those of their respective authors and may not represent the views of Fox&Hounds Daily or its employees thereof. Fox&Hounds Daily is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the site's bloggers.