Author: Dan Schnur

Kam Kuwata Award for Political Involvement Set Up at USC’s Unruh Institute

Anyone who’s reading this knows about Kam Kuwata, either by reputation or if you were lucky, by personal interaction and friendship. We know what an effective political operative he was, of course, and what a good and kind person he was as well. But one side of Kam you may not have seen was his willingness to be so helpful and encouraging to young people, and how devoted he was toward supporting them as they decided whether and how to involve themselves in public service.

He not only participated in our events at USC, but he would stay afterwards to talk individually with students who were considering careers in politics or government. He demonstrated to them that you could respect an opponent while still holding firm to your own principles and beliefs, and that you could fight fiercely on behalf of those beliefs without demonizing those with whom you disagreed.

As those of us who’ve known Kam for so many years begin to consider our own lives after politics, I can think of no greater tribute to him than to provide that same guidance and support to our next generation of political leaders. We at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and at the Unruh Institute are committed to carrying on his name, his memory and his legacy. We hope you’ll join us.

Read More »

California Court says No to Empathy

Within the space of a few hours, judicial tidal waves rolled across the country from opposite coasts last Tuesday morning. President Barack Obama secured the day’s first headlines, announcing Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

But California grabbed its share of the spotlight shortly thereafter, when the state Supreme Court voted 6-1 to uphold Proposition 8’s ban on same sex marriage.

Aside from the relative rarity of court-generated news making the front page, let alone forcing urgent breaking news updates over the course of the day, the two announcements seemed to have little in common. But as Washington insiders debated whether Obama’s announced criteria of a justice’s “empathy” was a valid basis on which to base a judicial appointment, California’s Supreme Court was providing a real-world, real-time example of the relevance of such thinking.

Read More »