Voters’ Right to Know Undermined by High Candidate Statement Fees, SoS Conflict of Interest
Can we really say we have a democracy, if the only candidates that voters have information about, is those who can ‘pay to play’? Yet
Can we really say we have a democracy, if the only candidates that voters have information about, is those who can ‘pay to play’? Yet
If this year’s presidential race has demonstrated anything, it’s that large numbers of voters want a choice other than that offered by the Democratic and
Grassroots Democracy is one of the Key Values of the Green Party. We take transparency and access to information about one’s government very seriously. That
A bill about to be passed by the Legislature – AB 1413 – would rob us of our right to vote for write-in candidates, a
The Green Party of California opposes Proposition 14 because it would reduce voter choice and political voice across political lines, while unfairly favoring incumbents, big money and party insiders.
By eliminating party primaries, expanding the number of voters that primary candidates have to reach and effectively front-loading the election process, Proposition 14 would put even greater emphasis on name recognition and early fundraising, increasing the corrupting influence of money and making it harder for competing candidates and movements to survive, let alone contend.
Because of pressure not to “split the primary vote” of their party’s faithful, incumbents and well-funded candidates would also be more able to “clear the field” and squeeze out competitors (like Schwarzenegger did during the recall), putting more power into the hands of party machines and insiders to, de facto, select general election candidates. As a result, Proposition 14 would stifle diversity and competition within the major parties and at the same time, limit the choices of independent voters who can already vote within the major party primaries.
Proposition 14’s backers are trying to sell this electoral scheme by promising it will deliver representatives of a particular political persuasion. Since when did the purpose of elections change from representing the people — whatever their views — to socially engineering a specific result?